One of the unexpected things that I have found through acquaintances on Facebook, are the diverse opinions on everything from God to food and everything in between. One of the current, long running dialogues that I have been engaged in, is with a young woman that went to school with me some time ago. I felt that I need to vent, so bear with me on this one.
The subject is whether or not, a loving God, really meant that homosexuality is wrong, whether or not people can help themselves, and whether or not love should be the deciding factor on marriage and relationships. My friend believes that love in any form, is a beautiful thing. We should not ever speak against such a union whether in a relationship or in life. Her comment was this " if a person loves another person, loves a tree, loves any other created thing, it is to be celeb rated and not condemned". This may sound right to you, or it may sound absurd, but the truth is that in this post modern society, what is right or what is wrong has become irrelavent and only necessary on an individual basis. What is right for you is right for you and I can't say anything different, is the common plea. I hope this may clear up some thoughts of mine on this.
First, let me just say that I am the worst sinner I know. I, in know way, am condeming any person, but must speak against what I believe to be incorrect, no matter how painful it is to hear. I believe that homosexuality in any form is "sin" as described in Scripture.(Rom. 1)(1 Cor.). However, I also believe that cheating on one's wife is sin, promiscuity and sexual relations outside of marriage, lying, cheating, lust, etc. are all "sins" and equal in abomination to God. As humans, we find ways to justify all sorts of behaviors and blame all sources for the actions that we knowingly choose. There have been arguements for physiological, psychological, medical, sociological, ethnic and a host of other reasons why we are "programmed" to do the things we do. Does this mean that we can just throw our hands up and lose our responsibility for our actions? Absolutely not. I do believe that all of us have outside or inside forces that lend us to certain behaviors, but I refuse to let that be an excuse, but just a reason behind it.
We must first look at why we do what we do. Scripture tells us that all areas of creation are affected by years and years of sins inhabitation. Even in nature we see signs of breakdown in normal function and order. Certain animals becoming extinct, ozone depletion, earthquakes, floods etc. We have moved far from the "garden" described in Genesis. Our bodies are encountering new diseases, mental challenges, and viruses that are crossing from animals to men in an alarming rate. It is not hard to believe that even our genes, mental stability and structures are corrupted by sin over years of inhabitation. Because this may be the case, does not mean that we can excuse behavior does it? My father, an alcoholic for many years, has discovered some amazing realities during his sobriety. The front temporal lobe of the brain, responsible for reason, does not process information for people born with an alcoholic proclivity, than other people. Most people can take a single drink and maybe another. Using normal reason they can limit their intake and control their behavior. An alcoholics reason does not process correctly, one drink becomes 3, and 3 become 6 and so on. Also, the portion responsible for pleasure, release endorfins in an alcoholic that rival the feelings of having sex. This does not even begin to address the physical demands and need that the body craves for the alcohol. As a society, we don't throw our hands up and celebrate alcoholism. We dont create laws to allow alcoholics to have equal rights as those that dont abuse alcohol, do we? We dont let people drive drunk and say, "oh well" because they cant help themselves.
Homosexuality may be choice, it may be a "gene" and it may even be as a result of upbringing. We, as a society, have embraced this behavior and encouraged teaching "alternative lifestyles". Which one of us wouldn't be horrified by the pedfile that abuses children? Don't we hear some of the same excuses as we find with homosexual behavior, or heterosexuals that chose to engage in sin and then blame this or that? Are we going to go so far as to embrace the pedifile given enough time?
Love was used as the underlying reason for tolerance and acceptance. Love is given as the reason for all consenting people to be able to be married. Lets look at this as well. In the original language of scripture, there are four different words to describe the subtleties of love's use. In English, unfortunately, we have only one word with a variety of uses. Phileo, love for freinds, agape, a love that requires nothing in return and is unselfish completely, another form to describe the physical kind of love and the last form to describe a familial love. Is love enough to guide our marriage decisions, our actions and our acceptance of others? We must strive to have "agape" love towards all people, but cannot excuse behavior that is contrary to what is good, pure and right according to scripture. Which one of us doesnt love our children with every breath that we have, yet, when behaviors are contrary to what we have taught them to be acceptable, we are dissapointed, angry and certainly punish when punishment is required. Our love for them cannot excuse poor behaviors. We dont hug our children in the midst of their rotten behavior and make room for them to continue in the spirit of "love".
Love is not one of feelings and emotions and lust exclusively, rather, it is a decision that we make every day, that comes with feelings and emotions some of the time. When scripture tells us to 'love our enemies", we are not filled with euphoric feelings of love and an overwhelming sense of desire to be with them. We make a decision to obey the Word of God and with the Spirit of God guiding us, sacrifice self for the good of the other.
This rant needs to end, but I hope that it has not fallen on deaf ears. Love needs to be of the upmost importance in our day to day interaction with each other, but not all inclusive, and not all equal under that love. We cannot, for the sake of love, embrace all sorts of behavior and condone it for the sake of inclusion. We must speak truth when truth is attacked, loving the attacker but hating the sin. Thanks for reading... Mike